Consultation on Proposals for Local Government Reorganisation in Gloucestershire

Closes 26 Mar 2026

This service needs cookies enabled.

Consultation on the proposal from Gloucester City Council

This includes a request to split existing district council areas between the proposed new councils. Please answer the questions on the proposal including the modifications. We will also ask you an additional question on whether you think there is a strong justification for these splits.

Consultation for 2 unitary councils:

  • Greater Gloucester City: Gloucester plus 12 parishes from Tewkesbury, 8 parishes from Stroud and 1 parish from the Forest of Dean  
  • Gloucestershire: Cheltenham, Cotswold, and the remaining parts of Tewkesbury, Stroud, and Forest of Dean 
1. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposal suggests councils that are based on sensible geographies and economic areas?
2. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposed councils will be able to deliver the outcomes they describe in the proposal?
3. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposed councils are the right size to be efficient, improve capacity and withstand financial shocks?
4. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposed councils will deliver high quality, sustainable public services?
5. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposal has been informed by local views and will meet local needs?
6. To what extent do you agree or disagree that establishing the councils in this proposal will support devolution arrangements?
7. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposal enables stronger community engagement and gives the opportunity for neighbourhood empowerment?
8. If you would like to, please use the free text box to explain the answers you have provided to questions 1-7 referring to the question numbers as part of your answer. You may also use the box to provide any other comments you have on the proposal.
9. This is a proposal that is accompanied by a request that the Secretary of State considers boundary change or that affects wider public services. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposal sets out a strong public services and financial sustainability justification for boundary change?
10. If you would like to, please use this free text box to explain your answer to question 9.
11. I confirm that I have not provided any information that identifies an individual in the free text box.